Originally Posted by
benblaney
For goodness sake! It was a deflection of a loaded question - nothing more. It may have been clumsy, and it may have been ill-considered, and with the benefit of hindsight he may well choose to say something else.
Let's remember Hanlon's Razor:
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."
Couldn't agree more.
This is much ado about nothing.
And believe me, I'm no Tilton apologist- I think he's horrendous.
But, in his defense, 99%+ of the posts about the merger on FT so far have been speculative AT BEST, and many of them downright idiotic.