Originally Posted by
notsosmart
It's all relative mate.
The more I think about it, the more reasonable it seems. Of course, you have to go with the grilled version to lose 10g of fat and all that breading, and you could also lose the sauce and substitute mustard (which is usually nearly calorie-free). As an added bonus, if your KFC is like most fast food joints, if you ask for a sandwich without sauce they will have to make you a new one as opposed to handing you one from under the heat lamp, so there is that, too.
The actual chicken is fine, and the little bit of bacon - well, you have to indulge occasionally. And anyway, I eat a lot of bacon, and I'm okay.
I'm a bit of a control freak (actually REALLY control freaky) and I like to know what my food looked like before it was cooked. KFC is about two steps up on the fast food ladder above Taco Bell. Grilled chicken from KFC just sounds gross (it just sounds like it would taste like dirt). They specialize in fried chicken (although not very well-I like Church's Chicken much better).