Originally Posted by
TSORon
(SIGH)
Here is the post that you made (emphasis mine):
What is it about DHS that you think is unavoidable or is called voluntary? Your statement makes no sense, I am asking you to clarify.
Your answer above has nothing to do with clarification of the statement you made and in fact only serves to throw more mud into the water. Were you perhaps talking about WBI's or AIT's? Either of those acronyms would make the question a bit clearer, but you used DHS which does not. Now I could be missing something else here, and if I am I am asking you to clarify your question. Its not that difficult a request to follow, it should not require a clarification of the request to clarify. IOW,
read what you wrote, it makes no sense.
OK, I'll draw you a picture.
Screenings at airports by TSA an agency that falls under the Department of Homeland Security
Screenings at bus stations by TSA an agency that falls under the Department of Homeland Security
Screenings at metro stations by TSA an agency that falls under the Department of Homeland Security
Screenings at cruise ports by TSA an agency that falls under the Department of Homeland Security
100 mile Constitution free zone enforced by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement an agency that falls under the Department of Homeland Security
The TSA has said all along that the federal government searching my belongs without warrant or probable cause is not a violation of my rights since I have a choice. I can fly or I can not fly. If I fly then I am voluntarily presenting myself for screening. But with the TSA reaching into everything laid out above I wonder how that can be the case.
So, the TSA has taken away all of my public transport options to travel to DC and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances without mandatory searches and ICE has done the same for me driving myself I ask you, how is it voluntary?