Originally Posted by
BubbaLoop
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/13/bu...flier.html?hpw
Doesn´t even get near describing how annoying it is to be constantly sent to secondary searches, possibly because this person only landed on the list last year. It does describe exactly how useless the redress system is.
You would think a "reporter" (and I use that term lightly) from a respected news paper would be able to get their facts straight. They are on the no-fly list, yet fly. Hmmmm. No they are on the selectee list.
I just wonder: if he can't that most simple fact correct, what other mistakes does he report? How can you believe anything he writes?