Originally Posted by
UA Fan
I am looking at a house built in '86 that does not have a sprinkler system, considering how bad foundation problems can be, is it worth going for this?
Would buying a house that has always been a rental property, be a risky one? especially something that does not have a sprinkler system? I'm thinking that the tenant would not have taken good care of the property. This house also has a lot of updates done to it.