Lets be real here. "Reasonable suspicion" is a subjective, not an objective matter. If an officer says he has "reasonable suspicion", in 99 of 100 cases, the court will take him at his word, regardless of whether there may have objectively existed reasonable suspicion.
Originally Posted by
Firebug4
Considering you don't appear to even understand what the term tigger control is I think you should troll somewhere else.
FB
Troll? He had his finger improperly positioned on the trigger, resulting in the murder of an unarmed, non-dangerous individual. If any non-law enforcement were to kill somebody in the EXACT SAME SITUATION, they'd be lucky if they were only facing manslaughter charges. A police officer gets a 3-week suspension -- and the police union has the gall to complain that a 3-week suspension for murdering a non-officer is too much, since the regular punishment for shooting someone by mistake is a reprimand. So excuse me if I don't buy for a second that all this training means a thing.