Originally Posted by
star_world
Maybe they should. Maybe they would have. Maybe they wouldn't. Lots of maybes.
One very relevant example is in my post which I clearly wrote above.
As for their agenda - "established in 1994 to focus public attention on emerging civil liberties issues and to protect privacy, the First Amendment, and constitutional values."
Anything they write is going to be slanted towards that. This piece certainly is.
And TSA's positions are completely bias free and on the up and up? Please.
So what if they have an agenda? If no one had an agenda, nothing would get done. They're at least up front and honest about what theirs is and aren't obfuscating it. TSA can't say that.
To get anything close to honest information out of TSA, it takes a media report or FOIA request.
Originally Posted by star_world
Get over it. I said they have an agenda, not that they're doing anything wrong. If they exist specifically to promote these items, then they are far more likely to turn a blind eye to points that directly contradict that.
And TSA is above that?