Originally Posted by
KECKIMAUSDRUCK
On the subject of perks, isn't there always the chance that a court would regard them as part of Ts&Cs on the basis of custom and practice?
Certainly. BA would point to the recent court case as an example of it finding that non-contractual issues were just that, of course, but it doesn't mean another court would find the same thing. It's the usual thing, where they aren't contractual unless and until a court says they are.