FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Is CX that bad?
Thread: Is CX that bad?
View Single Post
Old Mar 14, 2010, 9:09 am
  #34  
oatsmeal
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 109
Originally Posted by arthursiew
Price changed today.

CX+3K=$4136

SQ+MH+AK= $4245

Opinions?
In FT's spirit, wouldn't you pick SQ for the UA miles? (unless it's a non-mileage accruing fare)

For SFO-HKG, I prefer SQ because (a) the seats have better padding; (b) I will not go hungry on SQ flights; and (c) SQ has upgraded the blankets in Y on the 77W (it's thick and fluffy) and the SQ pillows provide better support.
oatsmeal is offline