FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Push-Back vs. Reverse Thrusters
View Single Post
Old Jun 16, 2001 | 12:42 pm
  #10  
bbinchi
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Seattle
Programs: AS MVP Gold
Posts: 1,093
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size="2">Originally posted by ChinaShark:
Not just AA. On a NW DC-9 a couple of years ago in MSP, pilot got on to say he was going to us reverse thrusters as a storm was approaching and he didn't want to wait for a push-back.
CS
</font>
Saving time was always the reason I heard for adopting the powerback practice, the theory being you can powerback and begin the taxi much more quickly than using a tug to pushback, having to disconnect the tug, waiting for the tug to back away, etc. I have also been told by pilots and mechanics (at airlines that use a tug for pushback) that powerbacking is hard on the engines in the best of conditions and, as mentioned above, there is always the danger of FOD (foreign object damage) from ramp debris.
bbinchi is offline