FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - LHR-AKL - worth booking F?
View Single Post
Old Feb 21, 2010 | 10:38 am
  #27  
Kiwi Flyer
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,443
Originally Posted by MrSoft
That LAN flight is not to be trusted! A colleague tried the same trick Syd-Akl. Flight is mayhem with a very poor punctuality record, potentially enough to spoil trip. Go for it only in a spirit of adventure.

I'd look into switching to EK for that last Syd-Akl hop. F available on the 388 (showers etc.) and it's just long enough to have a laugh. I do not know how the times align, mind.
While LAN on-time performance (OTP) between AKL & SYD is not as good as QF, NZ, etc; it still isn't bad (and much better than it used to be). EK also suffers in OTP due to being a tag leg.

LA schedule works well connecting to or from BA. In the event LA flight is seriously late or cancelled all pax are rebooked onto QF flights and there is one leaving not much later so can still make onward connections.

EK schedule is terrible for connecting to or from BA flights. SYD-AKL leaves early in the morning making for a risky connection on separate tickets and AKL-SYD is in the evening thus forcing an overnight at SYD.
Kiwi Flyer is offline