Originally Posted by
ExitRowAisle
As I look at different participants' categorization of flights, it is clear that this exercise runs the gamut from those who are very thorough (737-200, 737-300, etc.) to those who are less so.
My goal is just to be consistent, but I don't have a good enough grasp of airplanes to know whether I am accomplishing this as I move from one airline manufacturer to another. I'm looking for opinions from those who can shed some light on the subject.
For instance, if I choose just to list a 737 as one type of aircraft, should I list an MD-81, MD-82, MD-83, MD-88, and an MD-90 as 5 additional aircraft OR rather lump all of these or most of them (MD-90 possibly unique?) into a general category of MD-80's? Should 717's get their own unique category or be grouped with one of the MD-XX categories? What about Embraer 135's and Embraer 145's? CRJ100's and CRJ200's?
I understand that this probably boils down to a matter of personal preference, but I would like to make an informed decision. To put it into automobile terms, I want to avoid a situation where I have mindless classifications such as Ford, General Motors, Honda Accord LX Coupe, Honda Accord EX Sedan, Toyota Camry, Toyota Corolla, etc. Any insight on the matter would be greatly appreciated!
My rule of thumb is that if the airline makes a distinction (
e.g., 763 vs 762 on AA), then I make that same distinction in recording the aircraft. I use the generic model numbers (763-200) instead of the airline-specific ones (763-223), though, so the same models flown by different airlines will group together.