Originally Posted by
yukira
I've really been enjoying this thread but I am wondering about something. Many posters have indicated that they feel some food, say Chinese, is better is China than in SF or LA. I'm generalizing because I am not familiar with the different types of Chinese cuisine. When I was in high school I dated a guy who was from Hong Kong. His dad was a cook/chef both in Honk Kong and California. He finally got the money together to open his own restaurant. Now I couldn't tell you if it was good or bad food because I don't care much for Chinese food but why would his restaurant immediately be considered inferior because it was in LA and not China. At least that is the message I am picking up from some of the posts.
In most cases, it's all about the ingredients. The stuff you can buy cheap in Hong Kong, may be too expensive to obtain in LA. So they use substitutes. Also, sometimes extremely restrictive local health laws force the recipe to change.