FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Hotel Judging Thread
View Single Post
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 9:00 am
  #6  
baccarat_king
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: PBI | Formerly CLT, LHR & AMS (with just a bit of PSP)
Programs: Proud AA CK Spouse, AA Plat, HH Diamond, BonVoy Titanium, Caesars7* (comp), Wynn Black, HR Icon
Posts: 8,208
Originally Posted by kingalien
Any hotel that gives me comps is 20/20 in my book. Then again, only Venetian/Palazzo does that for me .
LOL, ^

Yes, I was thinking the same thing.

That's always the issue when doing Vegas comparisons.

Let's see :

MO suite for $550/night (making up the figure)
Palazzo suite for $0/night

4 night stay Palazzo instead of @ MO yields $2,200 in additional bankroll to use on the Palazzo trippie. Roll that $2,200 into current bankroll, spend 4+ hours a day @ the tables and get 3-4 more free 4 night stays over the next few months.

Maybe splurge to upgrade to a Siena Suite or Concierge Level, you are still ahead. Befriend a concierge, develop a relationship @ Palazzo and your service levels start to improve.

Will it ever be as good as the MO, absolutely not,

But the ROI for staying @ the MO is pretty lousy, IMHO.

Problem with The Vegas, is that if you gamble conservatively (and correctly), you are often comparing $0 to $xxx for a room.

Any other (non-gaming) city, it just becomes an issue of how much more to stay at the best. A lot different to go from $350 a night to $550 a night, in comparison from $0 a night to $550 a night. Not to mention the other big issue --- ROOM TAX! Comp rooms in Vegas = $0 tax, revenue rooms have a (IIRC) 12% hotel tax added to the room rate.
baccarat_king is offline