FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - AA SYD-LAX (QF) First post-cancellation, non-fare meta-discussion
Old Jan 19, 2010 | 11:26 pm
  #74  
craz
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,150
Originally Posted by channa
Not exactly a data point. That arrangement has two contracts -- the lease agreement with the predetermined price of the car, and the purchase contract where she bought the car. The dealer's position is that the two are different so it's an error.

In this situation, we have no such conflicting contracts. It's a single contract for the purchase.
Id disagree with You, if number_6 posted the truth about their tkt that its in A and has an A fare basis and not Q like 99.99% had,then AA will probably have to eat number_6s tkt and pay QF for the tkt

anyone with a Q fare basis is a different case and the contract is not clear cut,IMO as it is for number_6

Im sure AA will say like the car that since the fare bais was Q and thats Coach, that it was an error allowing them to book in FC since it was a Coach fare all along

but then what do I know
craz is offline