Originally Posted by
howard-socal
In recent months, I've flowed on the lie-flat C seats on UA, LH, and LX. I'd put them in that order for comfort and design. I'm not particularly wide, but I did find the LX pod felt quite cramped.
On LX, I had the lie-flat pod DEL-ZRH, then the old-style C seat ZRH-JFK (not recommended).
Not that I mind, but I think that is incredible that somebody would put UA in front of LH and LX. I think in the old days, it probably would have been LH, LX and UA. But things change. I have flown LH in C once, and I personally thought that it was inferior to UA. That was in 2005, so it is outdated, but I was not impressed with LH at all in C. I see the trip reports of the new LX, and it looks awesome. I think if you can get the new C cabin in LX, it is probably worth a try. LX is going to start non-stop service from SFO in June, so I would like to try that at some point. But kudos to UA for "winning" that ranking! ^