Originally Posted by
GUWonder
"What biases in that post of mine? DHS and DNI have failed to eliminate the turf protection issues that both were supposedly created to resolve.
And about the databases, let those who still care to get paid from being talking-heads do the work. I am not here to spoon-feed on demand."
Regarding your 1st paragraph, I'll let FT forum members figure that out for themselves with no help from me. Here is your statement that I referred to:
"Given what these more recent former or current officials involved in this or related areas are saying and the journalists repetition, it's clear that most of them either have no clue about how to get answers to understand what else is going on around them that is useful (or useless); it's also clear that the turf protection issues remain despite the claims that DHS and DNI offices would resolve that."
Fair and balanced, NOT. Vague statement-YES.
Regarding your 2nd paragraph, you make a comment that there are more databases out there but, when called upon to qualify your statement with specifics, you deflect. Oh, that's right, I keep forgetting everything you state is a "fact".