FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - article on ffdo's
View Single Post
Old Dec 23, 2009 | 3:35 pm
  #20  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,664
Originally Posted by Good Guy
Local, State, or Fed, we all have what we lovingly refer to as our 10%. Those bad apples, who are in a small percentage, continually make the rest of us look bad. I like your point about the TS+ not being screened. I don't know if I agree with it, but it is a good point. I guess my view is if a FLEO Special Agent for the IRS is allowed to carry on board, how come not the Local PD Officer? LEO is LEO. IMO. But I guess your Animal Farm quote hits the nail on the head.
Perhaps I'm jaded when it comes to local law enforcement from living in Chicago. (The city here intentionally covers up and/or ignores police misconduct as a policy. I do have the evidence to back this up, by the way.) So my question is, when a rogue FLEO is discovered, is the "system" any better at weeding them out than locally?

Also, as a general policy, wouldn't you say the less guns in the cabin, the better? I'm not sure how I feel on the topic. Also, if every cop flew armed, I think that might be a strain on the system in terms of the paperwork involved and the boarding process where everyone has to know everyone else. Finally, do FLEO's have a better background check than local, or is it the same one?

Regarding the TS+ folks not being screened, that's part of the TSA Amendment Act that the House passed. (Congress also exempted themselevs. ) This is the same Act that prohibits WBI as a first-run screening technique. So it wasn't my idea, though it has been mentioned here before.
Ari is offline