FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Rate oneworld
Thread: Rate oneworld
View Single Post
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 10:06 am
  #17  
Traveloguy
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold(OWE), QF LTG, MR Plat, IHG Spire, Hertz PC
Posts: 8,156
Originally Posted by Sagy

The bad
  • AA/BA: Can't redeem/earn miles on other airline US to/from UK
  • Partial credit (25%/30%) on some fares when "home" airline provides full credit on same fare
  • No ability to upgrade across OW partners (other than BA & QF)
  • OneWorld lack of coverage (for me mainly within Europe)
Quite confused at your appraisal of OW in respect to other alliances.
  • Firstly the AA/BA issue is related to competition issues and the fact that BA and AA don't yet have antitrust immunity.
  • Partial credit works definitely both ways. Star is all about metal whereas OneWorld is all about the codeshare you are travelling on. Overall I have to say I think that OneWorld is far superior in this respect as you never have to guess what the code may translate across to. Sadly on Star there are no public translation charts published at all and it takes hard core FT'ers to try to figure out what they _may_ translate to. This issue is probably the single most frustrating aspect of *A so I am surprised you feel it is good thing.
  • As your profile says your an EXP and I surprised you think you can use AA miles to upgrade BA and QF flights as you cannot. In fact the only OW programme you can use to upgrade other flights is CX although it is pretty restrictive.
  • OW coverage in Europe is actually pretty decent although the key issue is having to fly to the outer reaches of the continent to get anywhere else. LX of course would have solved this problem nicely, although we are now left with MA which is an airline which is underinvested in and cannot fulfill the role it was left with (I also suspect BA would not have liked MA to be in a position of strength anyhow).

Originally Posted by Sagy
The ugly
  • No elite bonus when flying on some OW airlines (regardless of fare paid)
  • Limited code share (e.g. AA has no code share to TLV, I think that BA, IB, RJ & MA) fly to TLV.
  • Only 11 members and it seem like little integration (e.g. can't book a seat from one member web site on another airline's flight)
  • Other than lounge access, as a OW Sapphire (I have been Emerald for less than a month), I haven't noticed any benefits on other OW airlines
  • Can't book OW (involve more than 1 airline) awards online
  • Elite bonuses on the AA programme are determined by AA themselves. In fact elite bonuses vary widely between programmes and alliances. I'm actually surprised how generous AA is with it's partners compared to other programmes both in OW as well as *A. Again, I suggest that if you did some proper research into other programmes, you might find that the grass is not greener on the other side and you are possibly in the best programme out there.
  • Code shares are up to airlines to decide bilaterally. Just because AA has decided not to codeshare to TLV does not make OW an ugly alliance.
  • From personal experience I have found *A to be slightly better integrated, yet when it comes to booking other members flights, OW seems better set up to do this. For example, use the AA website and the OW option, and booking other member airlines flights is very simple. In fact I feel AA might be the best website for doing this out of all airlines and alliances. Try doing the same with the UA website which promises much of the functionality yet fails to deliver. Also try the BD website to do anything and I think you would be very disappointed.
  • As you have been an Emerald for less than a month I really can't see how your in a position to judge this one. I have to say I would prefer Emerald recognition over *G any day of the week. Most carriers I have experienced issues with seem to be fairly helpful when you come in asking for assistance as an Emerald. *G (or OW Sapphire) however are pretty much run of the mill these days so partner airlines don't tend to give you too much in the way of 'above and beyond' service. LH is probably the one exception within *A although I would still keep one's expectations low.
  • Can I remind you that this is an AA issue and not a OW issue. MOST carriers out there don't allow booking of awards on partner carriers online. The few exceptions to this are QF, BA and NH. Most *A, ST & OW carriers don't offer this functionality.
  • Finally be aware that the seat booking issue is largely due to GDS issues. AA uses Sabre whereas most of OW uses Amadeus. That said, the issues one experiences on OW are also very much in existence on *A. Most often than not I have to call the operating carrier to get the seat that I want. Rarely have I ever been able to get what I wanted by calling the carrier who has control of my ticket.

Last edited by Traveloguy; Dec 22, 2009 at 5:57 pm Reason: missing bracket
Traveloguy is offline