No, Ron, I don't mind, because your non-answer just shows you don't know what you're talking about. Either you have direct experience with liquids at the checkpoint or you don't (option a). If you don't, then you can't really claim to know anything about how they're handled.

If you do have direct experience with liquids at the checkpoint, either they're all tested to see if they're explosives (option b) or not. If they are tested before any further action is taken, the question arise "why not test them while the passenger is still there?" at least in the case of Mr Gel-packs or someone with expensive duty-free perfume or liquor.

If they're not all tested (options c and d), then you don't know (as you've been saying repeatedly about foie gras) that the item is what the label says or whether it's a dangerous explosive. In which case, it must be treated as if it's an explosive. So either a HazMat team deals with it (option c) or you claim that tossing it in a garbage bin is standard EPA protocol for explosives (option d).

I expected you to weasel out of this but I'll give you a chance to provide "an accurate representation of the situation" instead of just claiming that none of this is true. You were the one who made the claim that
Are you now saying that's not true?