Originally Posted by
Superguy
Quite possible that TSA didn't hire the experts it thought it did too. I addressed the other issues in a previous post.
At any rate, TSA prides itself on adapting to an ever changing enemy. If TSA can't adapt even to GAO tests, how can it adapt to a real terrorist?
You can't sit there and tell me failure is OK because it's hard. In the real world, it's going to be hard. That is, unless Kippie was right in saying that they're only looking for dumb terrorists who'd use a Wyle. E. Coyote type of bomb. If a bomb goes off and it wasn't detected by TSA, the excuse "well, they hid it well and it didn't look like a bomb. It was hard to detect" isn't going to cut it.
Because what the GAO used is not what terrorist would use. It has nothing to do with adapting, has to do realism. Again, what is a "low-yield detonator"? According to out BAOs no such thing exist. So what exactly did the GAO agents use to represent their "IED"? Is it a resemblance of an IED because they said it is? I don believe so.