Originally Posted by
stupidhead
Oddly enough, the kids in my high school who got below a 1750 on the SAT said the same thing too. And the kids at my university who got less than a 160 on the LSAT seem to be saying the same thing about that test.
Lol the SAT and LSAT are not the same as the GAO so-called "test", the red team test, nor the ASI test. But specifically speaking of the GAO test, you assume those people had any idea what they were doing, and after reading the report, it should become clear they didn't. talking to the BAOs who work at SAT they, with their DECADES of experience working with IEDs, have absolutely no idea what a "low-yield detonator" is. In fact, once this report was published the BAOs around the country tried to figure out what these non-experts in IEDs did.
Just to bring simulant explosives onto an airport - simulant as in how it appears on the x-Ray, nothing that goes "pop" - takes weeks and weeks of paper work. TSA BAOs can not even bring in real explosives into the airport. If what the GAO testers used was not simulant, and it wasn't, whY exactly did they use? Putting something together and calling it an IED just because you want it to represent one, does not make it appear so on the x-Ray.