Originally Posted by RadioGirl

In this case, the decision is not "just" defending rights vs making the flight.

It's defending her rights PLUS having sufficient food for her child, vs making the flight BUT risking the comfort (and possibly health) of her child by having to "surrender" the formula.

As unpleasant as it would be to miss a flight with a young baby, it's not as bad as making that flight and then facing a hungry baby when there are mis-connections, delays, 14 hours locked in a RJ...