Originally Posted by
thadocta
Indeed - having 90% of a 20million pax market is nowhere near as bad as having 90% share of a 20K pax market, the former leaves plenty of revenue to go around whilst providing enough stimulus for competition, the latter does absolutely zilch for this.
(Numbers plucked out of thin air to make a point).
Dave
But this would be the exact opposite of what
Traveloguy was saying.