Originally Posted by
JerryFF
As several people have already indicated, I doubt that any US carrier has a significant percentage of their passengers making international to international connections, probably less than 1%. To redesign an airport to accomodate 1% or less of its incoming passengers is, in my opinion, not "moronic," especially if it generates a significant decrease in convenience for the other 99%. I doubt that US carriers lose much business because of this policy.
No, but for ages, we had a TWOV program (transit without visa) which, to keep us "safe and free" was eliminated, costing US carriers countless millions of dollars.