Originally Posted by
halls120
"TSA search for contraband was invalid as not a search for items prohibited from airplanes. The search continued after it was apparent that there were no prohibited items. United States v. Fofana, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45852 (S.D. Ohio June 2, 2009)"
Is that specific enough for you, Ron?
Hmmm, yes, but I was hoping that you would have something else to provide. Fofana is not a very good one to quote. Far to limited a ruling.
You clearly implied it, Ron.
No halls, you assume its implied. Sorry to bust your bubble there old boy, but I don’t know if the TSA could have stopped the 9/11 attacks. And neither do you.
While I don't know if TSA's procedures would have prevented 9/11, I do know what made the attacks successful - the lack of hardened cockpit doors, and the policy in place at the time which prevented airline crews from resisting a hijacking. That is why the hijacking were successful, Ron. Not lax gate security. No matter how many times you imply otherwise.
Those are
some of the things that made the attack successful. Many other things went into that attack being successful, and not all of it known to the agencies that have investigated it. They happily admit that there is much they don’t know. So, given that, I suspect that you only feel that you know, but are unable to substantiate your feelings.
Sorry, Ron, I'm not making this stuff up. Now just who is digging a hole for themselves?
You, but I know that you will never be able to bring yourself to admit it. Not here, not to me, and certainly not in public.
