Originally Posted by
goalie
yup and yup but if there is no father, the father is unfit, the father is himself incarcerated*, or something similar, then afaic, guess what-the children get turned over to department of social services. sorry, no "think of the children" from me as the tsa employee screwed up big time and should have thought about her children before hand. too bad, so sad
* if the father/husband/s-o was in fact incarcerated, it would be interesting to see how the background check would play out....
Someone is going to be watching the kids during her 48 hour stays, they can watch them for 90 days. This TSO like a police officer has a job that requires public trust, a TSO has total access to our luggage and can take things out and put things into it. Unfortunately they only charge her for the crime she was convicted of, which explains the 90 day sentence for $1000.00 in theft. I guess background checks can't predict future behavior.