Originally Posted by
jslost
2. They do, at all three closer airports
My gut instinct tells me it was more convenient for THEM, not us. If I do discover this to be true I won't travel (nor will my company) with them anymore.
Given your rebuttal to 2., I'm not quite sure how you can still think that the choice of diversion airport was because it was convenient for the airline. From experience, a diversion to an airport where you have no service or presence is far more difficult than diverting to an airport where you do. Trust me, it would have been far more convenient to divert to an airport with a presence so I would bet money on there having been a good reason to divert to Fresno.