FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - UA Denied boarding - 60 or fewer seats rule, and compensation
Old Jul 24, 2009 | 1:29 pm
  #1  
flyaway101
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Programs: nwa united delta
Posts: 125
UA Denied boarding - 60 or fewer seats rule, and compensation

Greetings,

Our flight from DTW-LHR was great, but the second leg of the return UA flight
(7/5/09) IAD-DTW was oversold and they called our name first (me and my
kid; I am a revenue ticket and my kid is a free ticket) to let us know
that will be denied boarding - INvoluntarily - without FIRST asking for
volunteers! Booked us on a flight that is to arrive 4+ hours later than
the original one. He said the only compensation that was permitted was ONE
of: (a) free round trip ticket, (b) voucher for (double) the one-way fare
(IAD-DTW), (c) $200 voucher - for each of my kid and me. I complained
about the process for choosing us and asked for other compensation -
cash/refund - options. He and his manager said no other options!

I sent an email to UA customer service and they said, "Department of
Transportation regulation does not require us to offer denied boarding
compensation when a customer is denied boarding due to safety-related
weight/balance restrictions that limit payload on aircrafts with 60 or
fewer seats," but proposed a revised option (b) above - cash payment of
$76.01.

I reviewed the DOT PART 250 OVERSALES. Then, sent a second email to UA
that they can't be selective in enforcing DOT rules. The rules state that
i) volunteers be asked first, yet they did not; ii) cash compensation be
offered as an option yet they initially did not. Finally, I do not believe
the DOT '60 or fewer seat rule' gives them blanket rights to reject denied
boarding compensation if the weight/balance restriction was reached w/o
following due processes - such as seeking volunteers etc. (I suggested a bit more generous with the compensation and offered couple of
specific ideas such as $400 voucher/person or free ticket voucher for
continental/Canada!)


Do I have any options or they are correct on some technicality of the '60 or fewer seat rule' despite not following some of the processes noted in previous para?
flyaway101 is offline