Originally Posted by
Gargoyle
You constantly compare DL to WN, but they are entirely different business models. WN cherry picks the most profitable routes; they fly between third tier airports, where fees are significantly lower. They only fly one airframe, greatly reducing training, maintenance and other costs. They provide a bare bones product that only does a few things, and they do that extremely well. As you saw this weekend, DL provides an incredibly comprehensive and complex product, and does many things extremely well.
It's like comparing apples to bicycles. The points you make aren't relevant.
The points are quite relevent. Delta has yet to show that it can offer products that its customers will pay the costs of, hence the ever increasing addiction to fees & rationalizations to justify them.
3rd tier airports? Like MSP, BOS, LGA, MKE & your own MDW? I think you need to fast forward a decade.