Originally Posted by
ButcherBird
If passengers now decline the extra legroom offered (at a price) and ignore the inflight health suggestions I think the chances of succeeding in a legal case against Qantas are lessened. It may not be popular with elites but from a shareholders perspective I think there is a lot to recommend in this strategy.
But how can that be? Passengers are given an option to travel in first class cabin (as an extreme example) much as if they would be given an option to travel in exit row - choosing not to pay for a seat in first class cabin would be the same as choosing not to pay for the exit row, would it not?