Originally Posted by
TSORon
This whole conversation comes down to a single point. One that everyone here has missed completely.
If a tree fall in the forest and there is no one around, does it make a noise? Logic says yes, but it cant be proven.
My point is, what does a passenger care if their image is being viewed by some anonymous individual in a remote location, who cannot see the person and wouldn’t know if it was their sister, brother, or mother and is unable to associate that image with a person. To that person viewing the picture, its nothing more than a very low quality black and white picture of what “may” or “may not” be a person. And like I said over at EOS, 99.4% of the humans in this country should not EVER be seen in the nude. Myself included. Personally, I would find that to be the worst part of having one of these machines in my airport. Worse than being forced to watch Sponge-Bob for hours on end.
Just a thought, but ...
If a tree falls in the forest, there aren't other trees standing on the edge of a nearby meadow taking pictures of it and rubbing their now turgid member's up and down, nor trying to sell images of said tree to other perverted trees around the forest. Moreover, if the tree has the wrong bark colour and leaf shape, was critical of the ongoing holocaust against Palestinians, or the wholesale murder of Iraqis, Afghans and Pakistanis in the war of terror, it doesn't have to worry that it wont be threatened by racist, establishment trees with the public release of the pictures of it falling if it doesn't follow and wholeheartedly support today's talking points from O'Reilly and aipac. In other words, the tree's deciduous rights are protected while it falls.