Originally Posted by
bmvaughn
Unless they can single-handedly change *A, this is unenforcable.
I'm not sure why this *G lounge access is so difficult to understand.
Originally Posted by
bmvaughn
Sure, they can either ask SQ to remove the *G sign thereby dis-servicing SQ pax who are *G, but not C/F pax.
Do you think SQ would do that?
Well, UA and US have unique exclusions to the *A access rules for each other so UA and SQ could do it too.
My predicition is that it will only take UA a short while to figure out that paying SQ to host domestic UA *G pax right next to an RCC is a losing proposition.