Originally Posted by
serfty
The intention of this phrase is to restrict the complimentary Gold Continental breakfast benefit to a maximum of two guests staying in the member's room.
That was my assumption (previously), without ever giving it much thought. However, I agree completely with soitgoes. And by no means do I mean to be argumentative, but how exactly are you sure you know the intention?
Originally Posted by soitgoes
Why should terms that are 100% in the control of HHonors be interpreted to favor HHonors and not the consumer? Usually such one-side contracts are interpreted in favor of the party who did not write the document.