Originally Posted by
sbm12
Agreed on all three counts. I had a 6-hour MX out of Europe and received an unsolicited $150 voucher that they were not required to send. I was rather pleased with that, considering it covered about 30% of that ticket cost.
Really??? I'm pretty sure that is what your post said yesterday before you edited it last night.
My editing was due to my great spelling as you konw
I did say a refund but maybe I wasnt clear enough,which I wil be in teh future. My point was instead of say a $150 voucher that CO should refund that amount in $$$. As Im sure after having flown the flight there will be some passenegrs that will not want to fly on CO again (except for the InBound flight that they must take). Or at leasy have it as an option as those who didnt pay for their tkts probably would want a voucher to use for their own travel rather then have the person who paid for the tkt get the benefit. (I also didnt say this on that other post)
PS actually post #27 wasnt edited at all yet, a couple of spelling errors (whats new) i did say $$ spent,but as usual I fully understood what I meant but didnt write it all out. I was not saying CO should refund 100% of everyones tkt. But do see how a person would think thats what I meant. My pt was $$ should be refunded and a voucher shouldnt be the route CO goes, unless its a substanial amount and the passenger wants that over the $$
Pt is a voucher doesnt cost CO anything but pretty much assures itself of the person purchasing at least 1 more tkt on CO and thusly CO gets some new ca$h, while a refund in $$ can mean that $$ is gone for good.