<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by quinella66:
I would think that it does not make sense that someone is legally required to split them in a divorce for these reasons:
1. They are not transferrable according to the rules of the program.
2. Their value is not easily able to be calculated. </font>
Again, use the example of stock options. Mr. Jones is an executive at a company that has given him 100,000 stock options. 1 - they are not transferable to anyone else, and 2 - their value is not easily able to be calculated.
Are you implying that they do not have value?