Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5G77 Safari/525.20)

+1

There's a whole field of corporate law covering this kind of situation. Suffice it to say, most courts won't let a plaintiff pierce the corporate veil to reach into a subsidiary owner's pockets absent some pretty extraordinary circumstances. That said, there's really no veil piercing issue in the Colgan situation as far as I see.