FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Arb ruling in?
Thread: Arb ruling in?
View Single Post
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 3:21 pm
  #6  
knope2001
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,653
JSOnline finally has a story on this.

------------------

http://www.jsonline.com/business/38018774.html

Arbitrator upholds Midwest Airlines' restructuring
By Tom Daykin of the Journal Sentinel

Posted: Jan. 21, 2009 3:17 p.m.

Midwest Airlines Inc.'s decision to hire another carrier to operate several Midwest Connect flights, resulting in job losses for Midwest's union flight crews, does not violate the company's contract with its pilots, an arbitrator has ruled.

Oak Creek-based Midwest Airlines announced last fall it was hiring Indianapolis-based Republic Airways Holdings Inc. to operate Midwest Connect flights that were previously flown under the Midwest Airlines name. That came after Republic agreed to provide up to $25 million in financing to Midwest, which helped prevent a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing.

Midwest's pilots and flight attendants unions both filed grievances, saying the outsourcing to Republic violated their contracts - a claim Midwest denied. The company says it will rehire laid-off flight crews after they're trained to staff the Republic jets, but only if they accept substantial pay cuts.

Midwest said today that the pact with Republic is allowed under the company's contract with its pilots union, according to the arbitrator's ruling, said company spokesman Michael Brophy.

Capt. Jay Schnedorf, head of the Midwest pilots union, said union officials are disappointed with the ruling but will continue to negotiate over the company's demands for pay cuts.

A separate grievance filed by the flight attendants union with another arbitrator is still pending.

------------------

I'm suspect there are two fundemental stumbling blocks on the pay issue. First, these are pilots who had flown aircraft designed for 150 and 120 coach seats, being downgraded to aircraft designed for 76 coach seats. Second, with layoffs the remaining pilots are probably very senior and near the high end of the scales. Both of those work against the pilots in their attempt to avoid serious wage cuts.

Hopefully they are able to come to an agreement. It's (very) mildly encouraging that the feedback from the union rep wasn't any harsher than this.

The sooner Midwest gets its house in order, the sooner they can embark on whatever changes they are likely considering. It's interesting to note that with the range of the 170 they could fly nonstop from MKE to the west coast. And the existing 717 and 170 fleet, once RSW and MCO go for the season they can rework their schedule to fly daytime nonstops to LAX, SFO and SEA with only minor changes to the rest of their current schedule. They may not choose to do this and instead redeploy the freed-up Florida lift to add frequencies in some existing routes. But I think they're purposely holding back on their summer changes...whatever they will be...until the picture is clearer.
knope2001 is offline