FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Why did captain of US 1549 refer to his plane as "Cactus 1549" ?
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 12:36 pm
  #41  
BearX220
FlyerTalk Evangelist
20 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,809
Originally Posted by Sally4th
I would guess there is also an element of what sounds good over the radio. Cactus has two syllables and hard consonants so it is very clear.
Ah, we have a winner. The main reason to adopt a callsign different from the airline's name is that the name itself is too long, or too heavy with mushy-sounding vowels that get lost in radio transmission. Note that all alternate callsigns have clipped, hard consonants: Clipper, Critter, Cactus, Speedbird, Redwood. The airlines they denote would be less easy to pick out of static: BeeOhAyyCee.... Pannamerricun... Virginamerricuh... etc. (The Speedbird call predates the BOAC / BEA merger.)
BearX220 is offline