Originally Posted by
CO EWR CPH
4Q 2009 does seem to be the standard estimate, do you think it might slip into 2010?
No, but I just found it curious. If it's the consensus idea, there's inherently little harm in attaching a name to where it came from.
Originally Posted by
CO EWR CPH
Hadn't noticed that until you pointed it out! Very funny. I guess since it is a blog different standards apply. I don't know what the Trib can do about it, I suspect their lawyers are very busy tending other fires....
I don't think bloggers are held to a lower standard, and that's probably precisely why USA Today did it...they undoubtedly know about the trouble at the Trib (negotiate that one, Shatner) and likely believe they have a reasonable choice of no one noticing...it is USA Today, after all.