Originally Posted by
ConciergeMike
Two observations: the 4Q09 thing reads as if it's on background...no name seems attributed to it.
4Q 2009 does seem to be the standard estimate, do you think it might slip into 2010?
Originally Posted by
ConciergeMike
Secondly, the Trib should sue the pants off USA Today. I thought the rule for avoiding plagiarism was to contribute original thought to another's work.
Hadn't noticed that until you pointed it out! Very funny. I guess since it is a blog different standards apply. I don't know what the Trib can do about it, I suspect their lawyers are very busy tending other fires....