FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - UX on LGA/EWR-ORD is a horrible idea
View Single Post
Old Dec 28, 2008 | 5:00 pm
  #14  
snic
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: HPN
Programs: not anymore! I'm FREE!
Posts: 3,486
Originally Posted by as219
Why? Do we have any hard data that RJ flights are more likely to be cancelled LGA-ORD than others? Having flown on them twice -- both in E+ -- I was pleasantly surprised at how much I preferred the smaller plane, even without sitting in an exit row. Now that F meal service on this route has been cut back to a deli plate anyway, what exactly is being sacrificed? Heck, I'd take 1CD on the EMBs over any 735/319/320 F seat in a heartbeat...
+1.

The only thing I don't like about the RJs is the cramped bathroom - the ceiling is way too low to stand up and urinate at the same time. (But then I appreciate a good P ).

OTOH, in my limited experience (two flights out of LGA), the later mainline flights to ORD actually took off BEFORE the RJs did (weather was delaying flights in both cases). Whether or not this is usual, I don't know.
snic is offline