Originally Posted by
ryan182
The other big part is its not the wife suing for her damages due to the idiot husband but they want UA to pay his fees and lost wages due to his stupidity. So its not a simple third party getting injured by someone who they claim was over served.
But the wife is suing for her own damages. They also raise other claims relating to the husband's losses, which I think are much less convincing. But the wife is in fact suing for her injuries and suffering.