FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Why is CX cheaper than AC when going to Asia?
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 8:05 am
  #3  
CanadianPie
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WinterPeg
Programs: AC Elite, Asia Miles, HH
Posts: 298
Originally Posted by ACYYZ/SD
I'm not at all a fare specialist, but would suspect it's because CX flies to MNL "online" (YVR/HKG/MNL) on the long haul and on the connection to the final destination. $110.00 is significant but not monumental in the fare game. My girlfriend just flew to BCN (AC FRA LH BCN). Booked online, AC/LH was substantially cheaper (by hundreds of dollars) than LH/AF/BA/KL. Bear in mind that it also hinges on availability in a particular fare class.

I realize there's also a difference between booking via travel agent and online. To add to my original post, the economy fare when I check AC.com was $1820.00... again, still more than the CX and AC fare with my travel agent.

I also have to point out that inherently being from Winnipeg, we're cheap so for many of my friends, they'd pick airfare that's $50 less if they can get it.

I just find it interesting that CX can come under the AC price. Unfortunately for me, I'll be flying AC while my friends and relatives fly CX. I guess that's the "sacrifice" to get you AP status miles.
CanadianPie is offline