Originally Posted by
Lehava
I'll chime in. YES I think they should. I dont even like peanuts, but I find it really rude and unfair when it is announced that no one on the plane can have any peanuts, or eat anything they brought with them that has nuts in it during the flight because ONE passenger has an allergy. The needs of ONE should not outweigh the needs/actions of many. Why should the person with the allergy prevent the diabetic who hasnt eaten and brought on a peanut butter sandwich from eating??????????? Or the child who has a snickers and now cant eat it? If you are that sensitive you should be finding private transportation not expecting an entire plane full of strangers to change their behavior to you.
so the very allergic passenger should be at risk in order for you to eat a snickers? give me a break.
Originally Posted by
tev9999
This brings up some very disturbing thoughts that I don't know if the TSA has addressed. While the cat is screened to make sure she does NOT have that glock under her collar, how do we know her real intent? She could be a trained killer just waiting to pounce.
My scenerio is probably more suited to dogs, and the larger breeds that would be service animals without carriers. How do we know that German Shepherd seeing eye dog is really not a trained killer just waiting for a pilot to open the flight deck door, jump over the barricade cart, rip his throat open, take out the pilot flying and then crash the plane? TSA better look at retraining BDOs in pet behavior too - I don't care how many billions of dollars it takes!
(I think I'm being sarcastic, but I'm not sure any more).
well, because we know who the terrorists are, all TSA has to do is to start requiring valid, government issued ID from all cats/dogs/ferrets to make sure they aren't on the no fly list...