Originally Posted by
DC8-41
I'd like to offer my apologies to the British Air staff (or their ground-handlers) at Geneva. I sincerely hope that I haven't caused you any grief. Even though British Airways failed dismally (in my humble opinion) in telling me, or other Geneva Executive Club members, of a significant change in handling procedures you came up trumps. I hope you won't get into trouble for breaking a secret rule, one that can't be substantiated even by BA employees that post here, but obviously must exist because they say so.
According to them you will all have to 'sharpen up' your act in the near future. However as irritated as I was at the change in rule, at the end of the day I was happy that we came to a compromise that met my needs, and didn't compromise your responsibilities.
To the BA employees here, I do appreciate your insight. But why are you even here? It doesn't seem that that you are acting in an official capacity and frankly I'm not impressed with your attitude. Your unsubstantiated comments only served to irritate, not inform. Saying that something is a legal requirement, doesn't actually mean it is. Does it? I certainly didn't find your collective comments helpful at all. You may be frequent flyers but ID00s don't really count do they? However I doubt that you actually give a stuff of my opinion. I'm only your customer, but to listen to you I'm your enemy.
I read today that SRB is crowing about how he could make a profit, from all the BA FFs abandoning ship. He may have another one.
I just cannot believe that you do not realize that you just simply cannot check in somebody else's baggage?!?!?! This is possibly the most common characheristic of all human societies worldwide. Please tell me you are joking. Are you really this foolish?!?!?
And if you think Branson will let you check in your wife's baggage, you will be in for a true shock!
Surely you are not this dumb? Surely....