Originally Posted by
cj001f
Given the gong-show that is LAX only connecting pax are going to be interested, for pax coming from the east their isn't much desire to go past CO & UT to ski, for pax coming from the north why go south to LAX?
SFO would have been much better in my opinion. AS disagrees; I assume they have knowledge to information I don't.
I wonder why not BUR? I agree the gong show that LAX is is only made worse by lugging snowboards/skis/etc. BUR is easier to get in/out which I'd think is the appeal for the Mammoth flights.