FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Women Travelers (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/women-travelers-166/)
-   -   TSA throwing out non-original bottles (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/women-travelers/1032059-tsa-throwing-out-non-original-bottles.html)

oldpenny16 Dec 26, 2009 8:16 am

TSA throwing out non-original bottles
 
Just heard from a friend who lost much of her beauty kit at a check point today. She had repackaged beauty products into the generic bottles sold at travel stores with her beauty and make up products that she buys in regular size bottles.

All of her non-original containers were taken and thrown out.

She was able to keep her hotel sized shampoo and conditioner in the original bottles that had the number of ounces printed on the bottle (3 ounce or less).

This is not going to get any easier.

ThatJohn Dec 26, 2009 9:06 am

Ugh. That's just stupid. I foresee TSA Approved™ bottles in our near future. :rolleyes:

oldpenny16 Dec 26, 2009 9:45 am

I can see that we will be paying a lot more for those products! Well, being careful of the do it yourself bottles does make sense, but I've saved an awful lot of money using those since the 3 ounce rule came in.

cheepneezy Dec 26, 2009 9:54 am

I just checked, my generic bottles(purchased from Walmart) are actually marked 3oz. Never had anyone inspect them close enough to notice though.

Policypeddler Dec 26, 2009 10:08 am

My last 3 or so trips thru TSA, I've left my clear plastic "baggie" inside my carryon and they haven't said boo about it.

Aviatrix Dec 26, 2009 11:14 am

I've had airport screeners (in Europe) try to do this to me on three separate occasions - twice in the UK, once in Germany.

On the first occasion I asked the screener to show me the rule that says that unmarked plain bottles aren't allowed. He relented ("I'll let you through this time"); I subsequently wrote to the airport authority who wrote back confirming that the screener had been wrong. (I have been carrying this letter with me ever since).

Similar dialogue on the second occasion (in Germany), screener relented ("I'll let you through this time") when I showed him the letter from the UK airport but still insisted he was right. Another letter of complaint, another - this time from the German Ministry of the Interior - again confirming I was right. That letter now lives in my travel wallet as well.

On the third occasion - at LCY - it took several email exchanges before the airport finally conceded that they had been wrong.

AFAIK there are no rules about unlabelled bottles, on either side of the Atlantic.

l etoile Dec 26, 2009 11:34 am

The point oldpenney16 makes is that this is apparently new - as in implemented today - in response to yesterday's incident. And this is not the first report I've heard of this happening today.

manneca Dec 26, 2009 11:50 am

Another stupid rule. What does it take to dump the contents of a hotel shampoo (or a travel sized one) and refill it with something else. If I were going to try to put something explosive in a 3.2 oz bottle, that's exactly what I'd do.

GoingAway Dec 26, 2009 12:21 pm

OP - what airport? The smaller stations are often over-zealous (and bored), taking regs to the nth unintended degree and abusing the passengers that pass thru as a result :td:

This would be stupid, as having a label does not prove the substance in the bottle is whats on the label ... and in my case, it never is.

l etoile Dec 26, 2009 1:28 pm


Originally Posted by GoingAway (Post 13056864)
OP - what airport? The smaller stations are often over-zealous (and bored), taking regs to the nth unintended degree and abusing the passengers that pass thru as a result :td:

This would be stupid, as having a label does not prove the substance in the bottle is whats on the label ... and in my case, it never is.

DFW is apparently doing it, according to a report in the TS/S forum.

Aviatrix Dec 26, 2009 4:33 pm


Originally Posted by l'etoile (Post 13056578)
The point oldpenney16 makes is that this is apparently new - as in implemented today - in response to yesterday's incident. And this is not the first report I've heard of this happening today.

Sorry, missed that bit. Still, I wonder if they have been instructed to confiscate unlabelled bottles, or if it's something they're just making up as they go along.

b1513 Dec 26, 2009 4:48 pm


Originally Posted by manneca (Post 13056682)
Another stupid rule. What does it take to dump the contents of a hotel shampoo (or a travel sized one) and refill it with something else. If I were going to try to put something explosive in a 3.2 oz bottle, that's exactly what I'd do.

That's the first thing that I thought of. How dumb is that rule?

Bobette

Georgia Peach Dec 26, 2009 5:39 pm


Originally Posted by b1513 (Post 13058124)
That's the first thing that I thought of. How dumb is that rule?

Bobette

It's the TSA. Dumb, knee jerk rules are SOP. :p

l etoile Dec 26, 2009 5:42 pm


Originally Posted by Georgia Peach (Post 13058311)
It's the TSA. Dumb, knee jerk rules are SOP. :p

That's what I was thinking ...right along with 'making up rules as they go along', as Aviatrix mentioned. Guess I should stop ...this is gonna sound like the TS/S forum. ;)

oldpenny16 Dec 27, 2009 9:12 am

we need data on what is happening now, today!
 
and we need to keep it up-to-date as much as possible.

People who are flying: what is allowed and what is being thrown out?

The news is full of rumors.

We need facts.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:41 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.