Plane Type M2H?
#16
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Alberta
Posts: 58
I suspect that Boeing in order to save its butt from destroying 1000s of MAX planes is creating all kinds of chaos and confusion while accomplishing its cunning plans to survive near total loss of its corporation in worldwide lawsuits and astronomical legal expenses. For now using words like "reconfiguration" means a lot on nonsense from software update to minor modifications to its dangerous planes in order to cover up as much as possible the actual design problem with MAX that was replacing 4 engines with 2 larger ones that caused severe aerodynamics problem for MAX an Boeing without solving those problems just included MCAST software to cover up main issue assuming that it could suppress lack of aerodynamics by 2 larger engines. Now MAX planes are totally useless.
#17
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Delta, BC
Posts: 1,646
I suspect that Boeing in order to save its butt from destroying 1000s of MAX planes is creating all kinds of chaos and confusion while accomplishing its cunning plans to survive near total loss of its corporation in worldwide lawsuits and astronomical legal expenses. For now using words like "reconfiguration" means a lot on nonsense from software update to minor modifications to its dangerous planes in order to cover up as much as possible the actual design problem with MAX that was replacing 4 engines with 2 larger ones that caused severe aerodynamics problem for MAX an Boeing without solving those problems just included MCAST software to cover up main issue assuming that it could suppress lack of aerodynamics by 2 larger engines. Now MAX planes are totally useless.
On re-read - I can see why you made the error - "4 engines with 2 larger ones" - wonder what Boeing aircraft that is?