Community
Wiki Posts
Search

No Champagne on 787?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 19, 2015, 2:15 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Seat 1A
Programs: Non-status paid F/J (best value for $$$)
Posts: 4,124
No Champagne on 787?

I just watched a video trip report on youtube and the menu shown in the video actually said that champagne is not available on the 787.

Is this really the case?

Any reason why VS decided not to serve champagne on the 787?
daniellam is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2015, 2:52 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Oxford
Programs: Skyteam Elite+, VS Red, HHonours Diamond, Accor Plat
Posts: 629
They swapped the Champagne for an English sparkling wine. Here's the advertising blurb on VS's site.

To accompany Lorraine’s amazing food and making a special appearance on board for the first time is Virgin Atlantic’s new sparkling wine from English winery Hambledon Vineyard. Proudly grown and produced in Hampshire, Meon Hill Grand Reserve has been specifically selected to compliment the cabin pressure and humidity of the 787 cabin and has been found to stay bubbly for longer. The new sparkling wine will be launched on Birthday Girl and will be available exclusively on the 787 aircraft.
stuart_f is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2015, 2:53 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Programs: VS Au, Skywards Au, BA Exec Ag, HH Diamond, Taj Au
Posts: 1,389
It is a tragedy
slinky09 is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2015, 5:47 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,194
What trip report is this? Can you provide a link?


I've not seen anyone mention this in any of the v-flyer TRs relating to the 787 and I'm sure it would have been - they like their champers almost as much as FT BA posters!
UKtravelbear is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2015, 6:55 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Programs: VS Au, Skywards Au, BA Exec Ag, HH Diamond, Taj Au
Posts: 1,389
Originally Posted by UKtravelbear
What trip report is this? Can you provide a link?


I've not seen anyone mention this in any of the v-flyer TRs relating to the 787 and I'm sure it would have been - they like their champers almost as much as FT BA posters!
It is true, allegedly it's a 'special' for the 787. Now I'm not knocking English sparkling wine, but the one onboard isn't champagne standard.
slinky09 is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2015, 2:04 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: LAX
Programs: UA Global Services 1MM,, AA Exec Plat. Hilton Honors Diamond, Marriott Gold, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 606
This includes UC?
globetraveler is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2015, 2:53 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: somewhere north of London, UK
Programs: HH Gold, BA Silver, Accor Silver
Posts: 15,245
Do bear in mind that English sparkling wines are consistently beating French champagnes in blind tastings and are frequently more expensive.

Just because it's called Champagne doesn't mean it's good....
Swiss Tony is offline  
Old Apr 19, 2015, 4:07 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,194
I have drunk Meon Hill under its former ownership (and confirmed it was sold last year) and it was lovely. Proper lush.
UKtravelbear is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2015, 12:38 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 124
Originally Posted by UKtravelbear
I have drunk Meon Hill under its former ownership (and confirmed it was sold last year) and it was lovely. Proper lush.
Morning,

The Meonhill vineyard is situated on my father's farm, just south of Winchester. Whilst I wouldn't call it "proper lush" I can assure you that it's of at least as good quality as, say, Pol Roger NV. (the vineyard currently only produces NV).

The biggest issue with Champagne and other sparkling Methode traditionelle wines is the length of time they're on lees during the second fermentation. This is what gives them the autolytical taste (yeasty), and it's what most buyers look for. The requirement for Champagne is a minimum of 18 months on lees. I believe that the current Meonhill is the 2010/2011 blend (there was no harvest in 2012). so you're looking at 3/4 years on lees.

My father sold his 50% share because, at 80 he felt that he needed to concentrate on his other, more long term businesses. The purchaser was a local vineyard.

As for the champagne label, well I'm not sure that a vinery that makes say 2,500,000 bottles a year (Moet & Chandon), whilst producing consistency, will give you anything memorable.
BrunswickSq is offline  
Old May 14, 2015, 11:57 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Australia
Programs: KrisFlyer, AA, Qantas, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 592
Originally Posted by slinky09
It is true, allegedly it's a 'special' for the 787. Now I'm not knocking English sparkling wine, but the one onboard isn't champagne standard.
I don't understand why this only affects the 787?
jubbing is offline  
Old May 14, 2015, 11:15 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Australia
Programs: QF LTS, Marriott LTP, ALL GOLD
Posts: 2,440
Originally Posted by jubbing
I don't understand why this only affects the 787?
Apparently the sparkling wine works better with the different pressurisation or something
ANstar is offline  
Old May 15, 2015, 4:14 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Programs: VS Au, Skywards Au, BA Exec Ag, HH Diamond, Taj Au
Posts: 1,389
Originally Posted by ANstar
Apparently the sparkling wine works better with the different pressurisation or something
Translated from bean counter speak that means "it's cheaper"
slinky09 is offline  
Old May 15, 2015, 12:18 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 124
Meonhill only produces circa 12,000 bottles of wine each year, they aren't being enough to supply all of Virgin's flights.
BrunswickSq is offline  
Old May 15, 2015, 12:19 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 124
Originally Posted by slinky09
Translated from bean counter speak that means "it's cheaper"
It's not, I can assure you.
BrunswickSq is offline  
Old May 18, 2015, 1:28 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 644
Was it still Lanson on board? Pretty vile itself.

Used to be LP, much more acceptable!
cazoz is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.